Concept creation[ edit ] The article was a reworked and expanded version of Bush's essay "Mechanization and the Record" Here, he described a machine that would combine lower level technologies to achieve a higher level of organized knowledge like human memory processes. Shortly after the publication of this essay, Bush coined the term " memex " in a letter written to the editor of Fortune magazine. As described, Bush's memex was based on what was thought, at the time, to be advanced technology of the future:
The article then went on to list a number of Russian weapons systems which were clearly superior to their US counterparts when those even existed. The US definitely has the quantitative advantage, but in terms of quality and training, Russia is way ahead.
So what is going on here? Why do otherwise very well informed people have such totally contradictory views? To speak with any authority on this topic I would have to have access to a lot of classified data both on the US armed forces and on the Russian ones. Still, I am confident that what follows is factually correct and logically analyzed.
To sum up the current state of affairs I would say that the fact that the US armed forces are in a grave state of decay is not as amazing by itself as is the fact that this almost impossible to hide fact is almost universally ignored.
The bottom line was this: US forces were better equipped quantitatively and, sometimes, even qualitatively than the others and they could muster firepower in amounts difficult to achieve for their enemies.
After WWII the US was the only major industrialized country on the planet whose industry had not Essay on latest scientific inventions blown to smithereens and for the next couple of decades the US enjoyed a situation close to quasi total monopoly.
That, again, hugely benefited the US armed forces but it soon became clear that in Korea and Vietnam that advantage, while real, did not necessarily result in any US victory. Following Vietnam, US politicians basically limited their aggression to much smaller countries who had no chance at all to meaningfully resist, never mind prevail.
If we look at the list of US military aggressions after Vietnam see here or here we can clearly see that the US military specialized in attacking defenseless countries. These wars will go down in history as case studies of what happens when politicians believe their own propaganda.
While Dubya declared victory as soon as the invasion was completed, it soon became clear to everybody that this war was a disaster from which the US has proved completely unable to extricate itself even the Soviets connected the dots and withdrew from Afghanistan faster than the Americans!
So what does all this tell us about the US armed forces: Actually, no, it is not. The recent wars in Lebanon, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq have clearly shown that well-adapted tactics mostly deny the US armed forces the advantages listed above or, at the very least, make them irrelevant.
This means that there is an emerging consensus amongst the countries which the US tries to threaten and bully into submission that for all the threats and propaganda the US is not nearly as formidable enemy as some would have you believe.
Why nobody seems to be aware of it The paradoxical thing is that while this is clearly well understood in the countries which the US is currently trying to threaten and bully into submission, this is also completely ignored and overlooked inside the United States itself.
This is both true and false. Potential nuclear target countries for the US can be subdivided into three categories: Countries who, if nuked themselves, could wipe the US off the face of the earth completely Russia or, at least, inflict immense damage upon the US China.
Those countries which the US could nuke without fearing retaliation in kind, but which still could inflict huge conventional and asymmetric damage on the US and its allies Iran, DPRK.
Those countries which the US could nuke with relative impunity but which the US could also crush with conventional forces making the use of nukes pointless Venezuela, Cuba. And, of course, in all these cases the first use of nukes by the US would result in a fantastic political backlash with completely unpredictable and potentially catastrophic consequences.
Others would, no doubt, disagree The bottom line: US nukes are only useful as a deterrent against other nuclear powers; for all other roles they are basically useless.
And since neither Russia or China would ever contemplate a first-strike against the USA, you could say that they are almost totally useless I say almost, because in the real world the US cannot simply rely on the mental sanity and goodwill of other nations; so, in reality, the US nuclear arsenal is truly a vital component of US national security.
Which leaves the Navy and the Army. The USN still controls the high seas and strategic choke points, but this is becoming increasingly irrelevant, especially in the context of local wars.Inventions (ISSN ) is an international scientific peer-reviewed open access journal published quarterly online by MDPI..
Open Access - free for readers, free publication for well-prepared manuscripts submitted in ; Rapid publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors approximately 21 days after submission; acceptance to publication is. Hindi Short Story “Jese ko Tesa”, “जैसे को तैसा” Hindi Laghu Katha for Class 9, Class 10 and Class Hindi Short Story “Lalchi Kutta”, “लालची कुत्ता” Hindi Laghu Katha for .
Advantages and Disadvantages of Inventions of Science Category: Blog On August 11, By Various Contributors Invention of science means the coming up of new useful processes, machines and improvements that did not exist there before. Misc thoughts, memories, proto-essays, musings, etc.
And on that dread day, the Ineffable One will summon the artificers and makers of graven images, and He will command them to give life to their creations, and failing, they and their creations will be dedicated to the flames.
"As We May Think" is a essay by Vannevar Bush which has been described as visionary and influential, anticipating many aspects of information society. Sep 19, · Latest PTE Essay Topics. PTE essays list, these topics are usually repeated in PTE Academic caninariojana.com questions may change but essays are from similar caninariojana.com PTE essay topics list will be updated as new topics appear in the exam.