Faulkner spent most of his life in the south, in Oxford, Mississippi. It was there where he created his fictional place that most of his short stories and novels were set. This fictional world he created was closely based on his surroundings and interactions in Oxford, Mississippi. The story follows the poor, farming Snopes family.
His literature work continues to be enjoyed by many people all over the world. However, William Faulkner uses a dramatic context of the two stories to create a feeling of sympathy.
Faulkner makes the audience feel a part of the southern town. The way most characters are portrayed in the two stories, Faulkner elicits a sense of sympathy from the audience. These two narrations have both similarities and differences in their context, an aspect that make the two stories interesting and unique.
It is also thought that Jefferson town in "A Rose for Emily" to be located in the same county.
However, a sense of unpleasantness, awkwardness and sympathy is reached from the story of how Jefferson town discovers that its longtime resident; Emily has been sleeping with the dead body of her dead friend with whom they had a relationship before his death.
When these individuals experience unfortunate incidents in their lives, their defensive mechanism is activated, and the only possible to way to protect themselves is through the creation of their own world. Through this, these individuals lose their linkage and connection to the societal values and ethics.
Abner Snopes, who is a defiant sharecropper and Emily Grierson, a single woman from an exceptionally prominent family, are both disconnected from their respective societies.
Both Abner Snopes and Emily are entangled in a kind of communal limbo.
Once in that limbo, Abner and Emily no longer feel the essence of sticking to the values and ethics of their respective society.
Therefore, they feel free to infringe both traditional societal morals and ethics. This is because Abner comes from a family with low economic background.
In contrast, Emily Grierson is on the affluent side of the social class. Abner is a sharecropper with no house or land property. Another difference between Emily and Abner is in the family. Abner is a family man with wife and children. In contrast, Emily Grierson has none and for the most part in the story, she is portrayed as living alone.
Emily consistently fails to accept the fact that she is not living in the old age, one that is restrained by old traditions. Emily has Negro domestic servant, Sartoris and the old board of Aldermen who represent the old views upheld by Emily in the story.
The traditional perspective has been associated with the old south, and all enthusiasts are portrayed as being the survivors of the civil war. These are the same people who continue to reject the changing civilizations of the new society in the narrations. The conflict that has been expressed in the story between the new and the old thoughts can also be viewed as a rivalry perspective between progressing present and the past traditions.
Emily experiences difficulties in accepting the death of a person with whom she had a relationship. Her obsession elicits a sense of sympathy from the audience since she is trying to stop time.
She is unable to accept death, which makes it difficult for her to move on with life. Furthermore, the death of Colonel Sartoris stirs a tension in the community because he had previously been exempted from paying taxes.
In addition, main characters in both stories who are protagonists make their own decisions. Therefore, after his death, Emily gains the freedom of love she has waited for long. Therefore, when Emily meets Homer Barron, she assumes that she has found her true love.
Contrary to her expectation, Homer is a homosexual; thus he can marry her. Thus, Emily opts to murder Homer in order to keep him with her forever. In the story, Faulkner implies that Emily sleeps with a corpse. This means that Emily must have been deeply in love with Homer, to persevere a rotten smell and the appearance of a dead body.
These actions arouse a lot of sympathy from the reader for Emily, who consoles herself by living with a corpse. However, the son ends up showing loyalty to the community at the expense of his family.Barn Burning is a short story that was written by an American author- William Faulkner.
Faulkner has brought out a mysterious characterization of Snopes. William Faulkner – Barn Burning. By Lauren Bradshaw. November 3, Sample Research Papers. Father and son team up and decide to ensure that they will not pay, ‘due to the.
View this term paper on Barn Burning Faulkner William Faulkner. Sarty's change in attitude and perception are resented to the reader with the help of two important Term Paper Barn Burning Faulkner William Faulkner and 90,+ more term papers written by professionals and your peers.
Immediately download the Barn Burning summary, chapter-by-chapter analysis, book notes, essays, quotes, character descriptions, lesson plans, and more - everything you need for studying or teaching Barn Burning.
“Barn Burning” Response William Faulkner is arguably one of the greatest writers of southern gothic literature of all time. Faulkner spent most of his life in the south, in Oxford, Mississippi. Harris, a local landowner, has charged Abner Snopes, a share-cropping tenant, with arson - burning down his barn in retaliation for Harris' reactions to repeated incursions by Snopes' hog in Harris' crops.
Abner and Sarty Snopes in Barn Burning Barn Burnin Abner and Sarty Snopes in Barn Burning Barn Burning Essays Abner and Sarty Snopes The nature of the relationship between father and son in William Faulkner's Barn Burning is displayed in the first paragraph of the story.
In general a father-son relationship would be built on genuine respect.