The debate over happiness vs money

It seems only natural that happiness should flow from having more money.

The debate over happiness vs money

What are the opposing philosophies of each system? Only a given individual can assess what is to his benefit or detriment. Capitalism places responsibility for an individual's prosperity in his own hands. Socialism attempts to determine an aggrigate good defined as "the good of the collective" and apply that one "shoe" to all "feet".

Capitalism is about individuals collaborating to supply needs. On the most basic level, capitalism allows individuals to organize and work together to supply services and goods that have value in communities, meet needs, and for which other citizens are willing to spend their money on to benefit from.

There is no exploitation involved at this most fundamental level. No transaction happens in capitalism unless both parties benefit Milton Friedman: Capitalism is not about enriching large and powerful corporations.

It was originally and remains largely about small groups of individuals in communities working together to supply collective needs. Critics who talk about big corporations in capitalism typically ignore the fact that the vast majority of businesses are small, community-based ones, and ones in which eye-popping profits are not made.

Most businesses are just community stores and organizations that pay reasonable wages and that communities would sorely miss. Capitalism allows for greater personal fulfillment.

For Personal use:

Socialism presents a "mob rule" where the collective or whomever controls the government outweighs any decisions made by individuals concerning their own lives. Individual "needs" are dictated by the state and so niche markets are prevented from forming. This causes a lack of innovation and social progress because major trends and even fundamental changes in society and technology start in niche markets with very specific needs that would not be considered "efficient" for the state to provide.

Under socialism, society is ruled by individuals collectively working together toward a common purpose to enhance the collective good. Socialism also promotes democracy, self-management, solidarity, equity and other positive social benefits as well as greatly increases prosperity and equality see the section on decision-making for more detail.

This compares favorably to capitalism, where society is ruled by corporations and their pursuit of profit and power. Capitalism does not guarantee societies needs. This is because social costs, and everything that affects third parties in a transaction, are externalised see discussion of market prices later in debate.

This means that social needs and costs are not reflected in pricing. As a result of this, the needs of society are ignored in capitalist society unless they are profitable - which they usually aren't due to the externalisation of social cost.

The pursuit of profit, that is necessary under capitalism, also promotes anti-social behaviour, punishes solidarity and means that all winning takes place at the expense of other. In capitalism, businesses must put profit before everything else.

In a system capitalism with a built in need for growth and expansion on every level based on profit and on a level of competition such that every company that fails to achieve a level of growth and expansion on par with its competitors will go out of business, it is entirely intuitive that businesses can ONLY be about making profit and expanding - everything else is secondary to that goal.

This is especially compounded by the fact that social costs are excluded from prices in capitalism since they affect third parties and so creating negative social costs is practically free and thus better for profit, while creating positive social costs or dealing with negative social costs is expensive and thus detracts from profits, and thus expansion and growth.

In fact, corporations the dominant business institution in modern capitalism were designed very consciously to this end and that corporations must put profit before everything else is written into law! Information on the causes and effects of capitalism's need for profit to come first is scattered around this debate you can easily find itbut particularly relevant for the effects are the discussions on how capitalism fosters imperialism, how profit is made through exploitation, the relationship between capitalism, militarism and war, and on the destruction of the ecosystem.

In capitalism, profit is made through exploitation.

The debate over happiness vs money

There are many ways that exploitation is used bring profit in capitalism. The first is through the exploitation of the workers by the capitalist class. This was first described in Capital by Karl Marx and has yet to be disproved.

Infoshop an anarchist information website describes this process the extraction of surplus value from workers quite succinctly: This surplus expresses itself as a surplus of goods and services, i.Also I want to know what the subject of the debate over Utilitarianism.

Quote: “Man does not strive after happiness, only the Englishman does that.” Book review: The theory defended by Bentham and Mill was summarized into three propositions.

This got me thinking about the great debate raging inside many working adults today: Money vs. Happiness. Money: 10 – Happiness: 2 At 41, my friend Eva is not rich, but she does earn a very good salary as a human resources manager in a federal agency.

New research is suggesting that happiness is determined not by how much money one earns, but rather, how one spends it. University of British Columbia associate professor Elizabeth Dunn explains why.

Photo: Getty. Here’s proof that money does bring happiness—but so does old age. getting over CrossFit brings a 17 times happy-to-unhappy ratio, and checking Linkedin monthly 18 times.

“Money may. Where do you sit in the money vs happiness debate? Which is more important? After reading this article, do you still feel the same way? The authors asked over 1, people from the United States and Canada to rate themselves on a happiness scale of 1 (miserable) to 5 (joyous), with 3 being “can’t complain.” What are your thoughts.

The economics of happiness or happiness economics is the quantitative and theoretical study of happiness, positive and negative affect, well-being, quality of life, life satisfaction and related concepts, typically combining economics with other fields such as psychology, health and sociology.

It typically treats such happiness-related measures.

The Debate: Can Money Buy You Happiness? | Jay Colby